|
An Honest Bureaucrat
"It
is not enough to say 'I am honest.' You should enforce your honesty and
confront the system. That's the bottom line." When Arun Bhatia utters
these lines, it is not for effect. An officer of the Indian Administrative
Service (IAS) with a career spanning over 30 years, he has earned a
reputation for exposing the shortcomings of and corruption in the very
system he works for.
Bhatia has paid a price for his actions - regular transfers, insignificant
postings and juniors being promoted ahead of him. But nothing has deterred
this bureaucrat; he just carries on digging out carefully guarded
skeletons from within the institutions of governance.
This time round, he has raised an issue that governments assiduously keep
under wraps - malnutrition. Two surveys conducted this year by the Tribal
Research and Training Institute (TRTI) - which he heads as Commissioner -
in Maharashtra's Nandurbar and Thane districts, reveal that the deaths of
many tribal children in these areas were related to malnutrition. The
government has responded by issuing a show-cause notice to him. But as
usual, Bhatia is sticking to his guns.
Though this report is the most publicized one over the past month, there
have been others. The officer has interpreted the mandate of TRTI to
include investigation into the status of various schemes meant for tribal
communities.
He says, "This institution is meant to do research and training. But
research in what - in folklore of tribals, artefacts and paintings they
produce, or make stupid calendars? Why don't we show malnutrition, death
by snake bites, lack of food, lack of clothing and basic necessities, why
don't we show their deprivation, poverty, hunger, their lack of land
titles, payment of money to get even firewood. We'll do research in
implementation and evaluation of schemes meant for the uplift of tribals,
implementation of land schemes."
And that is exactly what he has been doing - with a series of surveys
whose findings are startling, to say the least. Take the scheme for
financial assistance to pregnant tribal women. The aim of the scheme
(which covers five districts in Maharashtra) is to provide some
nutritional cover to pregnant women by granting Rs 800 each to reduce
premature birth and malnutrition deaths. The TRTI report published in May
this year states that out of an annual program budget of Rs 272 lakh,
almost Rs 72 lakh has been misappropriated (1US$=Rs 48). What's more, it
adds that "people, including the beneficiaries, know this is happening".
The survey was conducted in 19 villages spread over three blocks of Thane
district, and included 171 beneficiaries. Forty one percent of the
beneficiaries did not receive the full amount of money. In gross
exploitation of tribals' illiteracy, beneficiaries in some of the more
interior villages received only Rs 50!
While this and other reports by TRTI on corruption in various other
schemes did not create a flutter in government circles, the TRTI's
investigations into the death of many children in the tribal pockets of
Nandurbar and Thane districts have. And Bhatia has incurred the
government's wrath for using the word 'malnutrition' - a taboo in
administrative circles. According to Bhatia, the government of India had
asked TRTI to investigate reported malnutrition deaths in Nasik division
in 2001, because it was dissatisfied with the state government's
explanation. "This letter," says Bhatia, "was lying around for some
months, because it is a sensitive issue and no one wanted to take it up.
Then I came in December, did a survey, printed a report indicating that
the deaths were malnutrition-related mainly on basis of the nutrition
status of surviving siblings of dead children."
The survey covered 143 families that had lost 158 children in Nandurbar
district. It pointed out that the extent of malnourishment in 136 siblings
was 76.5 per cent; and of these, 40 per cent were suffering from severe
malnourishment.
While the Nandurbar deaths were from an earlier period and hence did not
raise hackles within the administration, a TRTI survey in Thane district
- of 25 families that had lost 26 children - created a furore. According
to the report, of the 27 siblings of deceased children, as many as 92 per
cent
were malnourished.
Bhatia says, "There are social workers who keep shouting that deaths are
malnutrition-related, but no one listens. Then some bureaucrat gets up and
claims that the deaths are not malnutrition-related, that shops are
stocked and medical facilities in place. This is reported in the press,
and the death-files are closed conveniently, quickly, without
investigation and without revealing the truth. I contradicted this and
sent a letter to Chief Minister and Chief Secretary and after that I was
served a show-cause notice."
In his reply to the notice, Bhatia has rebutted the government claim that
the tribals had access to food grain in the well-stocked fair price shops.
He says the impoverished tribals did not have the cash to buy food grain.
That much of the subsidized rice, sugar, wheat and kerosene in the shops
had not been bought by the families in Thane district that had lost their
children.
According to Bhatia, as many as 68 per cent families had taken loans from
moneylenders for food. "This episode of malnutrition leads on to
governance issues. How can they serve a notice on an officer for
expressing an opinion based on a scientific survey? It is an indication of
how feudal, autocratic and unprofessional the situation is; of how dissent
is treated. It is a serious governance issue and should be taken up."
This civil servant should know. In 1982, he had unearthed massive
corruption in the Employment Guarantee Scheme in Dhulia district. As
Collector of Bombay, he exposed land scandals involving senior IAS
officers. More recently, when Bhatia was Commissioner of the Pune
Municipal Corporation, he swung the baton against illegal encroachments
and construction by builders and politicians.
Bhatia has now initiated a citizens' campaign against corruption. "The
test of a good bureaucrat," he says, "is what he does to reform the
system."
– V. Radhika
November 10, 2002 |